Tags
Tab Item Content
Join Us!
Archives Meta
Notifications
Clear all

Human Biology DNA results of FULL BLOODED Austronesians!

44 Posts
7 Users
19 Likes
3,244 Views
cheesefries
Posts: 90
(@cheesefries)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago

When the Austronesians out of Taiwan migrated out of Taiwan 4,000 years ago and settled into the Philippines/Malaysia/Indonesia they admixed with the local Negritos forming today's Malayid race.. Proto-malayid is more the Australoid-influenced type while Deutero-Malayid picked up some Indian/Arab/Chinese/etc. On DNA tests/calcs it's stabilized all within the "Southeast Asian" category

Reply
14 Replies
James avatar
(@james)
Joined: 5 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1690

@cheesefries modern dna test can detect the Han chinese, Indians, Arab or melanesians DNA. If the DNA test are faulty then nobody will buy their product.

Reply
cheesefries
(@cheesefries)
Joined: 2 years ago

Estimable Member
Posts: 90

@james It depends on the specific test/calculator.. On some calcs a Malaysian will just score 100% Malaysian if they match the reference samples in their database almost exactly, while on other calcs it will display more of that interesting admixture.

Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@cheesefries which DNA companies is the most accurate for tracing full Austronesian blood?

Reply
cheesefries
(@cheesefries)
Joined: 2 years ago

Estimable Member
Posts: 90

@dyno 23andme is ok but doesn't really detect your exact Austronesian percentage.. they just group general Filipino ancestry under Austronesian for modern ancestry.

I would say G25/Vahaduo and the MDLP K23b calculator from Gedmatch are best

On G25/Vahaduo.. Austronesian ancestry will fall under Igorot and perhaps Dusun and other Malay groups I think.. even though modern Pinoys and Malays are also mixed with Proto-Malay/Austro-Asiatic component from mainland as well

My Gedmatch MDLP K23b results:

Population  
Amerindian 0.47 Pct
Ancestral_Altaic 0.17 Pct
South_Central_Asian 0.7 Pct
Arctic -    
South_Indian 3.09 Pct
Australoid 1.12 Pct
Austronesian 52.51 Pct
Caucasian 1.78 Pct
Archaic_Human -    
East_African 0.18 Pct
East_Siberian -    
European_Early_Farmers -    
Khoisan 0.22 Pct
Melano_Polynesian 1.28 Pct
Archaic_African -    
Near_East 0.3 Pct
North_African 0.09 Pct
Paleo_Siberian -    
African_Pygmy -    
South_East_Asian 31.08 Pct
Subsaharian -    
Tungus-Altaic 6.87 Pct
European_Hunters_Gatherers 0.11 Pct

 

On MDLP K23b "Tungus-Altaic" could be Han or Japanese/NE-Asian, while "SE-Asian" is Proto-Malay/Austro-Asiatic from mainland which is also present in Malays from the migration south.. even present in Filipinos as shown by my own results(31.08% SE-Asian)

'Austronesian' can be considered as a subset of Southern Chinese people

Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@cheesefries How the F can Austronesian be a subset of Southern Chines. Southern Chinese are closer to Han Chinese and maybe Vietnamese to some degree compared to a Austronesian.

Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@cheesefries 

My Gedmatch MDLP K23b results:

Population  
Amerindian 0.47 Pct
Ancestral_Altaic 0.17 Pct
South_Central_Asian 0.7 Pct
Arctic -    
South_Indian 3.09 Pct
Australoid 1.12 Pct
Austronesian 52.51 Pct
Caucasian 1.78 Pct
Archaic_Human -    
East_African 0.18 Pct
East_Siberian -    
European_Early_Farmers -    
Khoisan 0.22 Pct
Melano_Polynesian 1.28 Pct
Archaic_African -    
Near_East 0.3 Pct
North_African 0.09 Pct
Paleo_Siberian -    
African_Pygmy -    
South_East_Asian 31.08 Pct
Subsaharian -    
Tungus-Altaic 6.87 Pct
European_Hunters_Gatherers

0.11 Pct

 

Alright man, so you're not a true Austronesian. 

Reply
cheesefries
(@cheesefries)
Joined: 2 years ago

Estimable Member
Posts: 90

@dyno 

Malaysians/Indonesians/&Filipinos are only categorized as 'Austronesian' because of linguistics.. because the Austronesian rulers and culture imposed Austronesian languages upon everyone in the land. Malaysians/Indos are actually more 'Proto-Malay' genetically which is a mainland SE-Asia component and is basically a mix between East Asian and mainland Negrito/Hoabinhian-- The Austronesians arrived in Malaysia/Indonesia separately and imposed their language and genes upon the land.. Malays/Indos are an estimated 50% Proto-Malay + 30% Austronesian + 10% Han + 10% Indian/Arab etc give or take- even though their language is Austronesian in origin. I believe the Semang Negritos of Malaysia speak Austro-Asiatic languages though, which makes perfect sense based on the history.

Filipinos are around 65% Austronesian + 15% Han + 10% Proto-Malay + 10% Other(Iberian/Indian/Negrito/etc) depending on the calculator

Reply
abbm avatar
 ABBM
(@abbm)
Joined: 3 years ago

Trusted Member
Posts: 59

@cheesefries

  • Malays/Indos are an estimated 50% Proto-Malay + 30% Austronesian + 10% Han + 10% Indian/Arab etc give or take- even

    What the heck is a proto- malay

Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@abbm

The term Proto-Malay, which translates to Melayu Asli (aboriginal Malay) or Melayu Purba (ancient Malay) or Melayu Tua (old Malay),[3] refers to Austronesian speakers, possibly from mainland Asia, who moved to the Malay peninsula and Malay archipelago in a long series of migrations between 2500 and 1500 BC, and in one model the first of two migrations of early Malay speakers, before that of the Deutero-Malays.[4] The Proto-Malays are the ancestors of the Malays in the modern Malaysia and Indonesia.

image
Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@cheesefries Negrito DNA is too distant from the Austronesian genetic sequence. Science can easily identify Austronesian from Austroasiatic & Kra–Dai 

Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@cheesefries it's a myth, the average Filipino have barely melanesian DNA. 1-2% at most is the average for any Austronesian.

Reply
cheesefries
(@cheesefries)
Joined: 2 years ago

Estimable Member
Posts: 90

@dyno 

Actually 2-3% is the typical Papuan percentage for Northern Philippines

Southern Philippines on the other hand can have upwards of 8-10% Oceanian/Papuan admixture.. I've seen some DNA result samples of these Pinoys

Here's a lady from Bohol's DNA.land results (6.7% Oceanian/Papuan/Melanesian):

Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@cheesefries you mean 26 million people like Cebuano, Hiligaynon, bisaya?

Reply
James avatar
(@james)
Joined: 5 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1690

@cheesefries dravians are australoids and oceanians are similar to Polynesians

Reply
dyno avatar
Posts: 1462
Topic starter
(@dyno)
Noble Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Capturefilipino2
Capturefilipino

 

Both are 96% to 97% Austronesian even if the guy can pass as a Mexican. 

Reply
cheesefries
Posts: 90
(@cheesefries)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago

This vid seems pretty accurate:

Reply
cheesefries
Posts: 90
(@cheesefries)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago

Malay/Proto-malay component is genetically more Southeast Asian than Proto-Austronesian component I think

My LM Genetics K47 results:

Reply
josh avatar
Posts: 4380
Registered
(@zexsypmp23)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
fq78q5itqmo81
Reply
Page 2 / 4