Abstract
The Flynn effect has been widely researched in Western and European nations, while it has been comparatively understudied in Asian countries. This study examines possible Flynn effects in China from 1985–86 and to 2011–12. Results are reported for an IQ increase among 12 year olds on the Full Scale IQ WISC-R (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children- Revised) of 6.19 IQ points, a gain on the Performance IQ of 6.55 IQ points, and a gain on the Verbal IQ of 1.91 IQ points.
1. Introduction
Secular increases in intelligence were reported in the 1930s and 1940s in United States and Great Britain (Tuddenham, 1948; Thomson, 1949), and subsequently by studies in a number of other countries reviewed in Lynn (2013). Some forty years later, these increases were documented for the United States and other countries by Flynn (1984, 1987, 1998) and have become known as “the Flynn effect”.
The Flynn effect has not been widely studied in Asian countries. In Japan, Lynn and Hampson (1986) reported an average gain of 7.7 IQ points per decade for samples born from 1940 to 1965. In South Korea, IQ gains of 7.7 points per decade were observed for individuals born between 1970–1990 have been reported by te Nijenhuis, Cho, Murphy, & Lee (2012). In Taiwan, an IQ gain of 2.45 IQ points per decade in children measured by the WISC-III and the WISC-IV was recorded over the years 1997–2007 and an IQ gain in adults measured by the WAIS-III showed a smaller increase of 0.51 IQ points a decade over the years 2001–2011 by Chen, Liao, Chen, Chen & Lynn (2013) and similar gains have recently been reported in South Africa for Indians and other racial groups by te Nijenhuis, Murphy & van Eeden (2011).
In China, an increase in the intelligence of 5-to-6-year-olds of 4.53 points on the Chinese Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) from 1984 to 2006 was reported by Liu, Yang, Li, Chen & Lynn (2012), representing a gain of 2.06 IQ points per decade. In this paper, we contribute to the literature on the Flynn effect in Asian countries by reporting further data for an increase of intelligence in China in recent decades.
2. Method
The Chinese version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) was standardized on a Chinese urban sample of 3,812 6–16 year olds in 1985-85 by Yue & Gao (1987). The manual of the Chinese WISC-R does not give details of the socio-economic status of the standardization sample but there is no reason to suppose it was not representative of the Chinese urban population. The WISC-R consists of 12 subtests that are combined to give measures of Verbal IQ and Performance IQs. The Verbal IQ consists of the sum of the Information, Comprehension, Arithmetic, Vocabulary, Similarities and Digit Span tests, and the Performance IQ consists of the sum of the Picture Completion, Block Design, Object Assembly, Mazes, Picture Arrangement and Coding tests. The Verbal IQ and Performance IQs are combined to give a Full-Scale IQ, which is defined as the average of all cognitive abilities and is widely recognized as a good measure of general intelligence.
A further sample was tested with the same Chinese version of the WISC-R in 2011–12. The presence of a Flynn effect in China can be examined by a comparison of the scores of the two samples. The 2011–12 sample was obtained from the Jintan Child Study. This study consisted originally of 1,656 Chinese children (55.5% boys, 44.5% girls) consisting of 24.3% of all children in this age range in the Jintan city region born in 1999. The Jintan Child Study is an on-going prospective longitudinal study with the aim of exploring early health risk factors in the development of child cognition and behavior. Details of this cohort study have been described in a previous publication (Liu, McCauley, Zhao, Zhang & Pinto-Martin, 2010). The cohort took their first IQ test at age 6 (Liu & Lynn, 2011). To match the 2011–12 sample to the 1985–86 sample two steps were needed. First, the two samples need to be matched for age. The manual for the 1985–86 sample gives IQs for each half year, i.e. for those aged 6.5, 7.5 etc years. The IQ of those aged 12.5 years (n=346) is used for comparison with the 2011–12 sample of the same age. Second, because the 1985–86 sample was urban, only urban children were used for the 2011–12 comparison sample. This entailed omitting the rural children and gave an urban sample of 442 for 2011–12, comprising 54.9% boys and 55.1% girls, with an average age 12.2 years. Written consent forms were obtained from parents prior to the administration of measures.
The data for the 2011–12 sample were collected between spring 2011 and spring 2012 when the participants were in sixth grade or had just graduated from sixth grade. Participants were invited to the laboratory, where research assistants, who participated in an intensive training course, administered the paper form of the WISC-R. The research assistants were supervised by a Ph.D. trained clinical psychologist who specializes on cognitive brain assessment at Nanjing Brain Hospital. The same training procedure as described in detail in Liu et al. 2012 was followed. The IQ test was administered over the course of one hour in a quiet room in Jintan Hospital. Each test was scored by two individuals to minimize scorer bias.
3. Results
Mean (SD) scaled scores for Verbal, Performance and Full Scale IQs for the 1985–1986 and the 2011–2012 samples are presented in Table 1. The 2011–2012 sample obtained significantly higher scores on Verbal IQs (t=2.02, p<.05), Performance IQs (t=6.99, p<.001) and Full Scale IQs (t=6.19, p<.001) than the 1985–1986 sample, with increases of 1.91, 6.50, and 6.19 IQ points, respectively.
Table 1
WISC-R IQs in China in 1985–1986 and 2011–2012
1985–1986 National Norm Sample (n = 346) | 2011–2012 Sample (N = 495) | IQ gain | d | t | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
Verbal IQ | 99.7 | 14.5 | 101.61 | 11.84 | 1.91 | .15 | 2.02* |
Perform IQ | 99.8 | 14.1 | 106.35 | 11.93 | 6.55 | .50 | 6.99*** |
Full Scale IQ | 99.7 | 14.4 | 105.89 | 13.69 | 6.19 | .44 | 6.19*** |
d=the difference between the two means divided by the average sd.
t= the value of t as a test of the significance between the two means.
The correlation matrix for the Verbal, Performance and Full Scale IQs in the 2011–2012 Jintan sample are presented in Table 2. Consistent with previous studies, Verbal, Performance and Full Scale IQs were significantly inter-correlated.
Table 2
The correlations matrix of VIQ, PIQ and FIQ in 2011–2012 Jintan sample
VIQ | PIQ | FIQ | |
---|---|---|---|
VIQ | 1 | .426*** | .865*** |
PIQ | .426*** | 1 | .813*** |
FIQ | .865*** | .813*** | 1 |