Tags
Tab Item Content
Join Us!
Archives Meta
Archaeology by Prau...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Archaeology [Sticky] Archaeology by Prau123

1,909 Posts
12 Users
27 Reactions
5.1 M Views
Prau123 avatar
Posts: 3404
Topic starter
(@prau123)
Famed Member
Joined: 7 years ago

 

Teotihuacan's LOST LANGUAGE Secrets Finally Revealed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teotihuacan's LOST LANGUAGE Secrets Finally Revealed Archaeologists may have finally uncovered the lost language of Teotihuacan, the mysterious “City of the Gods” in Mexico. Once thought to be silent ruins, new research reveals that its murals might hide one of the world’s earliest writing systems — possibly the ancestor of the Aztec language, Nahuatl. In this video, we explore how scientists decoded symbols from over 500 artifacts, revealing a forgotten grammar of images that could change our understanding of Mesoamerican civilization. Could Teotihuacan’s collapse be tied to the loss of shared meaning — a warning for our own digital age?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Video

 

 

 

 


Reply
Prau123 avatar
Posts: 3404
Topic starter
(@prau123)
Famed Member
Joined: 7 years ago

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A major archaeological discovery has revealed a previously unknown and monumental temple complex belonging to the Tiwanaku civilization, a precursor to the Inca Empire that flourished in the Andes roughly between 500 and 1000 CE. Named Palaspata after the local Indigenous area, the temple is situated on a hill in the municipality of Caracollo, Bolivia, approximately 130 miles (210-215 km) southeast of the main Tiwanaku site near Lake Titicaca. The complex, which measures about the size of a city block (125 by 145 meters), features architecture typical of the civilization, including 15 rectangular enclosures arranged around a central sunken courtyard, with a layout suggesting alignment with the solar equinox for ceremonial rituals. The significance of the Palaspata temple lies in its strategic location and what it reveals about the extent of Tiwanaku's influence, challenging previous assumptions about its political geography. The hill sits at a crucial nexus connecting three distinct ecological zones and major ancient trade routes: the Lake Titicaca highlands, the arid Altiplano, and the fertile Cochabamba valleys. Artifacts found at the site, such as fragments of keru cups (used for drinking maize beer) and exotic materials like marine shells and turquoise, suggest it functioned as a vital "gateway node"—a center for both religious practices and regional commerce, helping to solidify the centralized, state-level control of the Tiwanaku empire far beyond its core territory.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Video

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/8X35zN0g31k?feature=share

 


Reply
Prau123 avatar
Posts: 3404
Topic starter
(@prau123)
Famed Member
Joined: 7 years ago

 

Big Mound St. Louis Missouri, Mound Pavilion, Destruction and Museum Fire #historicaltidbits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Starting in the 1850s and continuing until 1869, Big Mound was systematically destroyed to provide material to build railroads, make bricks and lay backfill in the St. Louis area. Big Mound was the largest of many dozens of other mounds in St. Louis that were mostly all destroyed by the early 1900s. Early on, St Louis was known as Mound City because of these indigenous mounds, but the name has slowly faded from memory, along with the rich history of the mounds and the culture that built them. Big Mound was a 34 foot tall platform mound, roughly 319 feet long and 154 feet wide. Some report that two burial chambers were discovered as they dismantled the mound, in one of them, the vault is claimed to have had plastered walls and 24 bodies. The bodies were covered in decorative bones, beads and seashell ornaments. Other artifacts were discovered, but all were lost in a fire. Only one of the dozens of mounds in St. Louis survived and is now called Sugarloaf Mound and is currently being preserved. The site where Big Mound once stood is now an industrial area, and is marked by a near forgotten tiny boulder, with a stolen plaque. Big Mound originally had a terrace extending off its east side before citizens of St. Louis Missouri began dismantling the mound over a period of 30 years. The east side terrace is similar to another of the mounds in the St Louis Mounds Group, the other being the three terraced Falling Gardens Mound. The single terrace on Big Mound is visible in rare sketches of the site. Beginning in the early 40s, citizens of 'Mound City' had already started cutting into the mound to build homes and roads. And in 1844, Field & Vandeventer Lumber Company removed the top two feet of Big Mound to create a platform for a wooden pavilion they constructed named Big Mound Pavilion, a pleasure resort. From this resort, which extended something around 80 feet above the streets below at its peak, residents had a view of the city and Mississippi river, including the notorious Bloody Island where people would stage duels. But it seems that the Big Mound Pavilion failed to attract enough tourists and in 1848, for reasons not entirely clear, despite the fact that the mound was located adjacent to a fire station, the wooden pavilion burned to the ground. A successful structure placed atop Big Mound, may have oddly led to its preservation. But this fire may mark the final nail in the coffin that eventually led to the full dismantling of the historic indigenous site built by the Mississippian culture. Big mound was destroyed over a 30 year period, ending in 1869 when the final remnants were removed. Native Americans, especially the Osage Nation, were unable to save the mounds in St Louis from destruction, exacerbated by the inhumane 1838 law that limited interactions between the Missouri settlers and native tribes (was not repealed until 1909). During this period, despite native tribes being unable to rescue the mounds, there were attempts by some conservationists, historians, academics and early archaeologists to preserve what they could from the mound. Looting was rampant, but many human remains and artifacts from the burial vaults were preserved in the St Louis Academy of Science. Unfortunately, in the same year that Big Mound met its end, museum suffered a fire which destroyed the portion of the building where the artifacts and remains from Big Mound were stored. One of the most interesting artifacts were a pair of copper earrings resembling the long faced god, commonly found at Mississippian archaeological sites. While these earrings never made it to the museum, unfortunately, they were misplaced. Suffice to say, Big Mound and the St Louis Mound Group in general, suffered a series of tragedies that nearly resulted in the complete extermination of the area's indigenous history. All that remains now are these photographs and writings of what was once an area as rich in history as the nearby Cahokia mounds. Only one indigenous mound (Sugarloaf Mound) of the 27 mounds that once existed in St Louis Missouri, survives today.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Video

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The area around present-day St. Louis, Missouri, was once known as "Mound City" due to the numerous earthen structures built by Mississippian culture Native Americans between approximately A.D. 600 and 1300. This area was part of "Greater Cahokia," an expansive civilization whose primary center, Cahokia Mounds, was located just across the Mississippi River in Illinois. The mounds in St. Louis and the surrounding region served various functions, including being burial sites, platforms for public buildings, and ceremonial centers. Tragically, most of the St. Louis mounds—including a major group of over 25 mounds in North St. Louis—were destroyed by development, quarrying, and industrial expansion by the late 19th and early 20th centuries, erasing a significant portion of the city's ancient heritage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Video

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kcSnY4DzijU?feature=share

 

 


Reply
Prau123 avatar
Posts: 3404
Topic starter
(@prau123)
Famed Member
Joined: 7 years ago

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Florida Platform is a massive, submerged limestone plateau that forms the foundation of the Florida peninsula. During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), approximately 22,000 years ago, global sea levels were dramatically lower, exposing a vast, continuous landmass twice the size of modern Florida. This expanded western portion of the Florida Platform was dominated by dry savannahs and expansive grasslands with scattered mixed woodlands, a critical difference from today's subtropical wetlands. This immense paleolandscape served as the territory for Paleo-Indians, the ancient indigenous peoples, and was a grazing ground for numerous species of megafauna. The grazers included animals such as the Columbian mammoth, American mastodon, giant ground sloths, extinct bison, and ancient horses. The archaeological record is rich, though much of it is now submerged or preserved in karst features like sinkholes and riverbeds due to post-glacial sea level rise. Key sites include the Page-Ladson site in the Aucilla River, which offers unequivocal evidence of pre-Clovis human occupation dating back 14,550 years, confirming that humans coexisted with the megafauna. A significant archaeological site associated with this submerged paleolandscape is the J&J Hunt site (8JE740). Located approximately six kilometers off the coast of northwestern Florida in the Gulf of Mexico, the site now lies in 3.7 to 4.6 meters of saltwater, but it was once along the ancient, exposed channel of the PaleoAucilla River. The J&J Hunt site provides critical evidence of both Late Paleoindian-Early Archaic and Middle Archaic occupations. Artifacts recovered, including chipped stone tools and debitage, along with preserved terrestrial faunal and floral remains, demonstrate that this area was a terrestrial settlement well-inland from the coast during the lower sea-level periods, offering a direct view into the patterns of early human settlement on the now-drowned continental shelf.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Video

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/731DmsolkV4?feature=share

 

 


Reply
Prau123 avatar
Posts: 3404
Topic starter
(@prau123)
Famed Member
Joined: 7 years ago

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The archaeological mystery at Florida's Crystal River complex revolves around a proposed, yet highly contested, link to the Maya civilization. Fringe theories point to several intriguing parallels: the presence of what researchers Pluckhahn, Thompson, and Rink describe as a unique stepped pyramid form (Mounds A and B at Roberts Island) and the appearance of a cross-in-circle motif on local pottery, which some fringe proponents interpret as the Mayan lamat glyph (representing Venus/Morning Star). These similarities suggest to a small minority that direct contact or influence from the Maya, hundreds of miles away in the Yucatán, may have occurred. However, the scholarly consensus overwhelmingly dismisses any direct Maya connection. The core of the evidence refuting the fringe theories lies in the artifacts themselves: the pottery bearing the cross-in-circle design was definitively manufactured using local Florida resources, ruling out acquisition through Mesoamerican trade. Mainstream archaeologists interpret this motif as the widely shared cross-in-circle symbol common across ancient North American indigenous groups, particularly those connected by the Hopewell Interaction Sphere. This cultural network, which strongly influenced the builders of Crystal River, is the accepted explanation for the shared design, making independent cultural transmission within North America far more probable than a trans-Gulf voyage by the Maya.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Video

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vJxNpUW2hVQ?feature=share

 

 


Reply
Page 356 / 369