Tags
Tab Item Content
Join Us!
Archives Meta
Archaeology by Prau...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Archaeology [Sticky] Archaeology by Prau123

1,033 Posts
12 Users
27 Likes
1.8 M Views
Prau123 avatar
Posts: 2529
Topic starter
(@prau123)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago

 

KNOWLEDGE FOR PRODUCING CERAMIC VESSELS ALSO CAME TO EUROPE THROUGH SIBERIA AND THE CASPIAN SEA REGION

 

A NEW STUDY SUGGESTS THAT THE KNOWLEDGE FOR PRODUCING CERAMIC VESSELS ARRIVED IN EUROPE NOT ONLY FROM THE MIDDLE EAST, BUT ALSO FROM THE FAR EAST THROUGH SIBERIA AND THE CASPIAN SEA REGION.

Examples of pottery figurines, such as the Gravettian culture Venus of Dolní Věstonice figurine, discovered in the Czech Republic, date to around 29,000–25,000 BC, however, the earliest examples of pottery vessels come from China around 20,000 to 19,000-years-ago.

The prevailing view among scientists was that the knowledge for producing ceramic vessels arrived in Europe, with the advent of agriculture from the Far East via the Middle East.

 

However, the new study now suggests that that the ability to produce ceramic vessels also appeared in the north-eastern corners of the European continent from Western Siberia and the region of the Caspian Sea, where the oldest vessels date back to around 5,900 BC In the northernmost part of Eastern Europe at the Pezmog archaeological site.

“In Europe, i.e. around the Baltic region, where Mesolithic pottery occurs, the origin of vessels is complex. Its appearance is dated to c. 4,700 BC and is believed to be the result of both Early Neolithic and secondary influences from the East,” said Dr. Hab. Agnieszka Czekaj-Zastawny from the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences.

A team of scientists, including academics from the University of York and the British Museum, as well as from Poland, analysed the remains of over 1,200 pottery vessels from 156 sites associated with hunter-gatherer communities in nine countries of Northern and Eastern Europe.

The study found that the ability to produce pottery penetrated from Siberia and the Caspian Sea to north-eastern Europe from about 5,900 BC, over the lifetime of possibly a single generation. The rapid dissemination of knowledge was possible not through migrations and population movements, but rather through the exchange of ideas between communities living next to each other.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article

 

 

Knowledge for producing ceramic vessels also came to Europe through Siberia and the Caspian Sea region (heritagedaily.com)

 

 

 

 

Reply
Prau123 avatar
Posts: 2529
Topic starter
(@prau123)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago

 

Ancient Mesoamerican calendar use far older than previously thought - study

The study sheds light on Mesoamerican history and shows that these ancient cultures use a calendar long before written evidence suggests.

 The site of Buenavista on the day of sunrise alignment. (photo credit: Takeshi Inomata)
The site of Buenavista on the day of sunrise alignment.
(photo credit: Takeshi Inomata)
 

Scientists have found new evidence of early use of the Mesoamerican calendar hundreds of years before written evidence suggests, shedding new light on the astronomical studies and practices of the ancient Olmecs and Mayans, a new study shows.

 

The findings of this study were published in the peer-reviewed academic journal Science Advances.

 

The study itself further sheds light on Mesoamerican history and shows that not only did these ancient cultures use a calendar long before written evidence existed, but it goes back even farther than previously believed.

 
 

Amateur archaeologist uncovers 20,000-year-old writing system

 
 

Mesoamerican history and the origin of calendars

The cultures in the Formative period of ancient Mesoamerica (1100 BCE to 250 CE) stretched out throughout Central America, with advanced cultures like the Olmecs and the Mayans creating their own civilizations, cultures and architecture.

 

One thing to note about Mesoamerican culture, however, was the existence of their calendar.

 
 Excavations at Aguada Fénix. (credit: Takeshi Inomata)Excavations at Aguada Fénix. (credit: Takeshi Inomata)

While there were a few kinds of calendars in use, the most famous kind is the 260-day calendar. This was widespread throughout Mesoamerica and did not exist outside it. 

 

This calendar played extremely important roles in Mesoamerican society, being associated with important rituals and religious cosmology and giving names, among other things.

Historically, it was unclear why the calendar was specifically given 260 days, though theories existed, like how the numbers 13 and 20 were important to the Mayans. But either way, the calendar is also unique for just how different it is from calendars in antiquity in other parts of the world.

 

Calendars are fascinating because largely speaking, most of them tended to be rather similar in structure, being usually built around the solar or lunar cycle. As such, most calendars accounted for 12 months with 30 days each, give or take a few. 

 

By contrast, the Mesoamerican calendar was so distinctly different, though it should be noted that a 365-day calendar was also used in Mesoamerican culture, albeit differently.

 

But when did the Mesoamerican cultures like the Olmecs and Mayans actually create their calendar? 

 

We don't even know who made it, though many have theorized that the Olmecs had been the one to advance it and spread it.

 

The earliest known calendar was dated to sometime between 700 BCE to 500 BCE, but many have theorized it could go back even further.

 

However, this new study may have pushed back the date even farther, to around 1100 BCE.

 

Ariel scans revealed a surprising discovery

This new discovery was made possible thanks to analyzing ancient Olmec and Mayan archaeological sites in the southern coast of the Gulf of Mexico. 

To figure this out, the researchers made use of aerial laser scanning to analyze the orientations of several ceremonial architectural complexes in the area.

 

This area spanned a total of 84,516 square kilometers and connected the western Maya Lowlands with the Olmec core zone. This saw 33,935 different architectural complexes.

 

However, the researchers were most concerned with 415 specific complexes and their astronomical orientations, and what they would have been back in the Formative periods.

 

They then took into account the pattern of dates marked by solar alignment. This was to see if they would align with the rising and setting of the Sun and Moon in sync with the 260-day calendar. 

 

Synchronicity here would make sense since it would imply that the calendar was used for agricultural rituals, something dependent on seasons and the rising and setting of the Sun and Moon. 

 

The advanced understanding of the Mayans

What the researchers found was that most of these complexes seemed perfectly aligned. 

 

The angles of the complexes corresponded to how the Sun and Moon would rise and set. There were orientations that seemed to also correspond with other astronomical phenomena, such as the extremes of Venus, which was thought to herald rains and harvests. 

 

What this ultimately indicates is that Mesoamerican cultures like the Mayans may have had some very advanced and sophisticated understanding of the stars even all the way back in 1100 BCE. 

 

But the fact that they were all constructed in such a way that matched up with the 260-day calendar shows that the calendar itself was likely in use back then, too – several hundred years earlier than was previously believed.

 

 

 

 

 

Article

 

Ancient Mesoamerican calendar use far older than previously thought - The Jerusalem Post (jpost.com)

 

 

 

 

 

Reply
Prau123 avatar
Posts: 2529
Topic starter
(@prau123)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago

 

Lasers reveal massive, 650-square-mile Maya site hidden beneath Guatemalan rainforest

An example of one of the lidar scans of a Maya civilization discovered in Guatemala.

A complex of Maya pyramids in Guatemala as seen via lidar. (Image credit: Ancient Mesoamerica )

 
 

Geologists in northern Guatemala have discovered a massive Maya site that stretches approximately 650 square miles (1,700 square kilometers) and dates to the Middle and Late Preclassic period (roughly 1000 B.C. to 250 B.C.). 

 

The findings were the result of an aerial survey that researchers conducted via airplane using lidar (light detection and ranging), in which lasers are beamed out and the reflected light is used to create aerial imagery of a landscape. The technology is particularly beneficial in areas such as the rainforests of Guatemala's Mirador-Calakmul Karst Basin, where lasers can penetrate the thick tree canopy.

Using data from the scans, the team identified more than 1,000 settlements dotting the region, which were interconnected by 100 miles (160 kilometers) of causeways that the Maya likely traversed on foot. They also detected the remains of several large platforms and pyramids, along with canals and reservoirs used for water collection, according to the study, which was published Dec. 5 in the journal Ancient Mesoamerica(opens in new tab)

The lidar data showed "for the first time an area that was integrated politically and economically, and never seen before in other places in the Western Hemisphere," study co-author Carlos Morales-Aguilar(opens in new tab), a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Geography and the Environment at the University of Texas at Austin, told Live Science in an email. "We can now see the entire landscape of the Maya region" in this section of Guatemala, he said.

Related: What's hidden inside the ancient Maya pyramids? 

 

So, what made this region so enticing that the Maya would want to settle there in the first place?

"For the Maya, the Mirador-Calakmul Karst Basin was the 'Goldilocks Zone,'" study co-author Ross Ensley(opens in new tab), a geologist with the Institute for Geological Study of the Maya Lowlands in Houston, told Live Science in an email. "The Maya settled in [this region] because it had the right mix of uplands for settlement and lowlands for agriculture. The uplands provided a source for limestone, their primary building material, and dry land to live on. The lowlands are mostly seasonal swamps, or bajos, which provided space for wetland agriculture as well as organic-rich soil for use in terraced agriculture."

A lidar scan of the Maya site in Guatemala. 480w, 650w, 970w, 1024w, 1200w" data-sizes="(min-width: 1000px) 970px, calc(100vw - 40px)" data-original-mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/H9vkyQ6zD5TLuro3d59Zz8.jpg" data-pin-media="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/H9vkyQ6zD5TLuro3d59Zz8.jpg" data-ll-status="loaded" />

A smattering of triadic structures in the civic center of El Mirador, an ancient Maya site located in Guatemala.  (Image credit: Ancient Mesoamerica )

Researchers have previously used lidar to scan Maya sites in Guatemala. In 2015, an initiative called the Mirador Basin Project(opens in new tab) conducted two large-scale surveys of the southern portion of the basin, focusing on the ancient city of El Mirador. That project led to the mapping of 658 square miles (1,703 square km) of this section of the country, according to the study.

"When I generated the first bare-earth models of the ancient city of El Mirador, I was blown away," Morales-Aguilar said. "It was fascinating to observe for the first time the large number of reservoirs, monumental pyramids, terraces, residential areas and small mounds."

 

Researchers hope lidar technology will help them explore sections of Guatemala that have remained a mystery for centuries.

"Lidar has been revolutionary for archaeology in this area, especially if it's covered in tropical forest where visibility is limited," Marcello Canuto(opens in new tab), director of the Middle American Research Institute at Tulane University and an anthropologist who wasn't involved in the study, told Live Science. "While surveying, we tend see a small part of the causeway, but lidar lets us see things that are big and linear. This research lets us see the area for the first time; the fact that we have this data is transformative."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article

 

 

Lasers reveal massive, 650-square-mile Maya site hidden beneath Guatemalan rainforest | Live Science

 

 

 

Reply
Prau123 avatar
Posts: 2529
Topic starter
(@prau123)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago

 

We Finally Know How Ancient Roman Concrete Was So Durable

PHYSICS
 
 
 

The ancient Romans were masters of building and engineering, perhaps most famously represented by the aqueducts. And those still functional marvels rely on a unique construction material: pozzolanic concrete, a spectacularly durable concrete that gave Roman structures their incredible strength.

Even today, one of their structures – the Pantheon, still intact and nearly 2,000 years old – holds the record for the world's largest dome of unreinforced concrete.

The properties of this concrete have generally been attributed to its ingredients: pozzolana, a mix of volcanic ash – named after the Italian city of Pozzuoli, where a significant deposit of it can be found – and lime. When mixed with water, the two materials can react to produce strong concrete.

But that, as it turns out, is not the whole story. An international team of researchers led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) found that not only are the materials slightly different from what we may have thought, but the techniques used to mix them were also different.

The smoking guns were small, white chunks of lime that can be found in what seems to be otherwise well-mixed concrete. The presence of these chunks had previously been attributed to poor mixing or materials, but that did not make sense to materials scientist Admir Masic of MIT.

"The idea that the presence of these lime clasts was simply attributed to low quality control always bothered me," Masic says.

"If the Romans put so much effort into making an outstanding construction material, following all of the detailed recipes that had been optimized over the course of many centuries, why would they put so little effort into ensuring the production of a well-mixed final product? There has to be more to this story."

Masic and the team, led by MIT civil engineer Linda Seymour, carefully studied 2,000-year-old samples of Roman concrete from the archaeological site of Privernum in Italy. These samples were subjected to large-area scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and confocal Raman imaging to gain a better understanding of the lime clasts.

One of the questions in mind was the nature of the lime used. The standard understanding of pozzolanic concrete is that it uses slaked lime. First, limestone is heated at high temperatures to produce a highly reactive caustic powder called quicklime, or calcium oxide.

Mixing quicklime with water produces slaked lime, or calcium hydroxide: a slightly less reactive, less caustic paste. According to theory, it was this slaked lime that ancient Romans mixed with the pozzolana.

Based on the team's analysis, the lime clasts in their samples are not consistent with this method. Rather, Roman concrete was probably made by mixing the quicklime directly with the pozzolana and water at extremely high temperatures, by itself or in addition to slaked lime, a process the team calls "hot mixing" that results in the lime clasts.

"The benefits of hot mixing are twofold," Masic says.

"First, when the overall concrete is heated to high temperatures, it allows chemistries that are not possible if you only used slaked lime, producing high-temperature-associated compounds that would not otherwise form. Second, this increased temperature significantly reduces curing and setting times since all the reactions are accelerated, allowing for much faster construction."

And it has another benefit: The lime clasts give the concrete remarkable self-healing abilities.

When cracks form in the concrete, they preferentially travel to the lime clasts, which have a higher surface area than other particles in the matrix. When water gets into the crack, it reacts with the lime to form a solution rich in calcium that dries and hardens as calcium carbonate, gluing the crack back together and preventing it from spreading further.

This has been observed in concrete from another 2,000-year-old site, the Tomb of Caecilia Metella, where cracks in the concrete have been filled with calcite. It could also explain why Roman concrete from seawalls built 2,000 years ago has survived intact for millennia despite the ocean's constant battering.

So, the team tested their findings by making pozzolanic concrete from ancient and modern recipes using quicklime. They also made a control concrete without quicklime and performed crack tests. Sure enough, the cracked quicklime concrete was fully healed within two weeks, but the control concrete stayed cracked.

The team is now working on commercializing their concrete as a more environmentally friendly alternative to current concretes.

"It's exciting to think about how these more durable concrete formulations could expand not only the service life of these materials, but also how it could improve the durability of 3D-printed concrete formulations," Masic says.

The research has been published in Science Advances

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article

 

 

We Finally Know How Ancient Roman Concrete Was So Durable : ScienceAlert

 

 

 

Reply
Prau123 avatar
Posts: 2529
Topic starter
(@prau123)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago

 

Ancient Roman concrete was incredibly strong — scientists may have just figured out why

 
A young man eating an ice cream looks towards the Pantheon.

A tourist at the Roman Pantheon on May 12, 2022. Scientists may have cracked the secrete of why ancient Roman concrete, used on this building, was so durable. 
Raul Moreno/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
  • Ancient Roman concrete is incredibly durable, even more so than modern concrete. 
  • Scientists have long wondered what gave it its incredible strength. 
  • One team may have cracked the mystery — focusing on tiny white flecks once seen as imperfections.

It's one of the great mysteries of archaeology: how did the Romans create concrete so strong that their buildings are still standing 2,000 years later? 

The question has long puzzled scientists, not only because the concrete has incredible strength, but also because it seems to be able to self-heal — meaning cracks inexplicably disappear over time. 

The Pantheon in Rome is a perfect example of this. The structure, built around AD 126, has been in constant use since then. But its intricate dome looks brand new even today. 

So what made this material so special? A group of scientists from MIT and Harvard, who published their results in the peer-reviewed journal Science Advances on January 6, may have cracked it. 

These scientists suggest the secret is in white flecks found in the concrete called "lime clasts."

 

The dome of the Pantheon is shown with light beaming through its center. This intricate concrete structure is made up of beveled squares that line the whole surface of the dome.https://i.insider.com/63c1851f01aaab001848aa45":{"contentType":"image/jpeg","aspectRatioW":1713,"aspectRatioH":1285} }" />

This concrete dome inside the Pantheon has stood the test of time. 
Stephen Knowles Photography/Getty

White imperfections that make the concrete perfect

Although these flecks are seen in pretty much every Roman structure, they have usually been dismissed as imperfections in the building material.

Any concrete is made up of a few basic elements: a liquid binding agent, called a mortar, and aggregates (typically loose gravel, sand, or small rocks). Roman mortar was made using lime, a chemical created by heating limestone.

The general belief was that the lime was first mixed with water, before adding in the aggregates. The flecks were seen as a sign the mortar was not well mixed by the builders. 

But Admir Masic, an author of the research and an MIT professor of civil and environmental engineering, said he was never really convinced.

"If the Romans put so much effort into making an outstanding construction material, following all of the detailed recipes that had been optimized over the course of many centuries, why would they put so little effort into ensuring the production of a well-mixed final product?" he said in a press release

After studying the flecks more closely, Masic and the team of scientists concluded that they were likely to have been put there on purpose. This, they found, was crucial to the self-healing property of the concrete.

 

Flecks that are extremely important for self-healing

 

A 3D model shows a lump of concrete lit up in red blue and green. A large red lump is present at the front of the lump. The red represents calciumhttps://i.insider.com/63c185e633ffb700180fa1d8":{"contentType":"image/jpeg","aspectRatioW":2000,"aspectRatioH":1500} }" />

Scientists have analysed the elements in this lump of concrete. A false color image shows a large lump of calcium, in red, on this image. 
Courtesy of the researchers

 

Lime clasts — the white flecks — are quite brittle, and that's a good thing. 

As cracks appear in the concrete, the clasts crumble, releasing calcium that can travel through the fracture. When water seeps into the cracks, the calcium, seen above in red, reacts with the water, creating new crystals. 

These crystals automatically fill the crack and fix the structure. 

 

An aerial view of the pantheon shows the perfectly shaped round dome.https://i.insider.com/63c5192cbcd21800196b7924":{"contentType":"image/jpeg","aspectRatioW":1695,"aspectRatioH":1271} }" />

Aerial view of the Piazza della Rotonda with the Pantheon and City Buildings, Rome. 
Nico De Pasquale Photography/Getty Images

An explosive mix

The scientists believe this could only happen if the lime was added to the concrete in its heated, powdered form.

Right after it is heated in the kiln, lime is very reactive and can be dangerous.

It is extremely dehydrated at this point. So as soon as this chemical comes into contact with water, it incorporates it into its chemical structure to make a more stable molecule. That reaction releases a lot of energy, which releases intense heat.

When people make concrete, they usually add water to the powdered lime first, let it cool down, then add the aggregates.

But by mixing the lime with the aggregates, then adding water, the Romans created a controlled explosion, raising the heat in the mix just enough to change the concrete's chemical composition, which led to the incorporation of the lime clasts, Masic said.

The scientists put their theory to the test. They made up concrete blocks, one using the powdered lime and one using a more modern version of the concrete that did not. Then, they deliberately smashed the blocks to create cracks.

They found that the Roman formulation was repaired within a couple of weeks under a drizzle of water. The modern formulation did not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article

 

 

Ancient Rome: Science May Have Solved Mystery of Super-Strong Concrete (businessinsider.com)

 

 

 

 

Reply
Page 93 / 195