Tags
Tab Item Content
Join Us!
Archives Meta
The origins of the ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Government & Laws The origins of the Indian Act: A history of oppression and resistance

11 Posts
5 Users
2 Likes
1,261 Views
Lannie avatar
Posts: 806
Topic starter
(@meleona)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Introduction to the Indian Act

To be federally recognized as an Indian either in Canada or the United States, an individual must be able to comply with very distinct standards of government regulation… The Indian Act in Canada, in this respect, is much more than a body of laws that for over a century have controlled every aspect of Indian life. As a regulatory regime, the Indian Act provides ways of understanding Native identity, organizing a conceptual framework that has shaped contemporary Native life in ways that are now so familiar as to almost seem “natural.”

–Bonita Lawrence1

You can read the Indian Act online, at  http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/i-5/

The Indian Act is a Canadian federal law that governs in matters pertaining to Indian status, bands, and Indian reserves.  Throughout history it has been highly invasive and paternalistic, as it authorizes the Canadian federal government to regulate and administer in the affairs and day-to-day lives of registered Indians and reserve communities. This authority has ranged from overarching political control, such as imposing governing structures on Aboriginal communities in the form of band councils, to control over the rights of Indians to practice their culture and traditions. The Indian Act has also enabled the government to determine the land base of these groups in the form of reserves, and even to define who qualifies as Indian in the form of Indian status

While the Indian Act has undergone numerous amendments since it was first passed in 1876, today it largely retains its original form.

The Indian Act is administered by Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), formerly the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (DIAND). The Indian Act is a part of a long history of assimilation policies that intended to terminate the cultural, social, economic, and political distinctiveness of Aboriginal peoples by absorbing them into mainstream Canadian life and values.

The origins of the Indian Act: A history of oppression and resistance

The Indian Act came to be developed over time through separate pieces of colonial legislation regarding Aboriginal peoples across Canada such as the Gradual Civilization Act of 1857 and the. In 1876, these acts were consolidated as the Indian Act.

“The great aim of our legislation has been to do away with the tribal system and assimilate the Indian people in all respects with the other inhabitants of the Dominion as speedily as they are fit to change.”

– John A Macdonald, 1887

The Gradual Civilization Act, passed in 1857, sought to assimilate Indian people into Canadian settler society by encouraging enfranchisement.  In this sense the act was a failure, as only one person voluntarily enfranchised.2 By 1869, the federal government had created the Gradual Enfranchisement Act which established the elective band council system that remains in the Indian Act to this day.

The Gradual Enfranchisement Act also granted the Superintendent General of Indian Affairs extreme control over status Indians. For example, the Superintendent had the power to determine who was of “good moral character” and therefore deserve certain benefits, such as deciding if the widow of an enfranchised Indian “lives respectably” and could therefore keep her children in the event of the father’s death. The Act also severely restricted the governing powers of band councils, regulated alcohol consumption and determined who would be eligible for band and treaty benefits. It also marks the beginning of gender-based restrictions to status. For a closer look as to why this is, see our section on the marginalization of Aboriginal women. For a more specific look at the process of excluding women from their status rights in the Indian Act, read Chapter 9, “The Indian Act,” in Volume I of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.)

The confederation of Canada presented the federal government with the challenge of uniting distinct and separate Aboriginal groups under one law. Therefore, despite the diversity of experiences and relationships between Aboriginal peoples and settlers across the country, including strong military and economic alliances in certain regions, Confederation established a very different relationship between these two groups by disregarding the interests and treaty rights of Aboriginal peoples and uniformly making them legally wards of the state. Systems of control that had been established in prior legislation were now newly defined under one act, the Indian Act of 1867. This act effectively treated Aboriginal people as children—a homogenizing and paternalistic relationship.

Since the first pieces of legislation were passed, Aboriginal peoples have resisted oppression and sought active participation in defining and establishing their rights. Early on, Aboriginal leaders petitioned colonial leadership, including the Prime Minister and the British monarchy, against oppressive legislation and systemic denial of their rights. The legislation against Aboriginal peoples did not stop Aboriginal practices but in most cases drove them underground, or caused Aboriginal peoples to create new ways of continuing them without facing persecution.

https://indigenousfoundations.arts.ubc.ca/the_indian_act/#amendments

Reply
10 Replies
ASIANS 4 BLACK LIVES MATTER 黑人的命也是命 avatar
Posts: 2959
(@naval)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Good start. 

Reply
3 Replies
Flower Girl
(@flower-girl)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 889

@naval 

Indian act was more than 100 years ago

Reply
ASIANS 4 BLACK LIVES MATTER 黑人的命也是命 avatar
(@naval)
Joined: 5 years ago

Famed Member
Posts: 2959

@flower-girl 

how many of them are left in Canada?

Reply
Flower Girl
(@flower-girl)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 889

@naval 
Around 1 670 000 individuals in Canada self-identify as Indigenous people, corresponding to 4.9% of the total population in 2016. Among the three groups, First Nations are the largest (at 60% out of total), followed by Métis (36%) and the Inuit population (4%)

Reply
KBella
Posts: 149
(@kbella)
Estimable Member
Joined: 4 years ago

There is no First Amendment in Canada. You can be captured in the event that you condemn the secured native gatherings

Reply
5 Replies
Flower Girl
(@flower-girl)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 889

@kbella 

The right to practice one's own culture and customs including language and religion.

Reply
KBella
(@kbella)
Joined: 4 years ago

Estimable Member
Posts: 149

@flower-girl 

I call this priviledge

Reply
Wei nihao
(@wei-nihao)
Joined: 4 years ago

Honorable Member
Posts: 517

@kbella 
are you American who goes to Canada or Canadian that lives in the US? you seem to argue as if you're Canadian then deny it when you don't answer something.

Reply
KBella
(@kbella)
Joined: 4 years ago

Estimable Member
Posts: 149

@wei-nihao 

no, I am just triggered by the left's agenda to demonize white people. 

Reply
Lannie avatar
(@meleona)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 806

@kbella 

I live here. Left or Right, The First Nation people are very angry at the moment. unmarked graves have reached 1,000 just for two churches alone. There is a movement to investigate more Catholic residential schools.

Reply