Tags
Tab Item Content
Join Us!
Archives Meta
'Jomon woman' helps...
 
Notifications
Clear all

'Jomon woman' helps solve Japan's genetic mystery

5 Posts
2 Users
1 Likes
1,595 Views
josh avatar
Posts: 4380
Registered
Topic starter
(@zexsypmp23)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago

'Jomon woman' helps solve Japan's genetic mystery

Tuesday June 11, 2019

She had brown eyes, thin curly hair and dark skin that was prone to sun spots. Her earwax was wet and she had a high tolerance for alcohol, even though she never drank spirits.

We know this and much more about a woman who lived and died 3,800 years ago.
All of these details were deduced from her genetic information, meticulously pieced together by a Japanese research team in a breakthrough project of genome sequencing.

The researchers mapped the entire genome of a person from prehistoric times to an unprecedented degree of precision and complexity. What they found tells us not just how she looked, but could eventually answer the question of where the Japanese came from tens of thousands of years ago, and how people lived on the archipelago in the millennia since.

And given that modern Japanese inherited about 10 percent of the DNA present in the woman, she could contribute to an understanding of the diseases and medical conditions to which the Japanese are prone.

A woman from the past
Researchers at the National Museum of Nature and Science and six other institutions launched an anthropological project to investigate the genetic origins of the Japanese. In May 2019, the findings were published in the journal Anthropological Science in a paper titled, "Late Jomon male and female genome sequences from the Funadomari site in Hokkaido, Japan."

During Japan's Jomon period from about 16,000 years ago to 3,000 years ago, people lived as hunter-gatherers. As some of their DNA was passed down to modern Japanese, unraveling their genome is important to understand who the Japanese are and where they come from. This has only recently become possible with the rapid improvements in DNA sequencing technology.

 

The woman lived on Rebun Island off the northern tip of Hokkaido, the northernmost prefecture of Japan. Her bones were excavated together with those of 27 of her fellow villagers. Researchers discovered that the mitochondria DNA contained in her remains, and those of another male, were in particularly good condition.

The condition of such remains depends largely on the environment in which they were preserved. DNA deteriorates rapidly under warm conditions, so it was fortuitous that the woman came to rest in subarctic conditions.

The researchers proceeded by taking a molar from her skull and drilling a hole to extract the nuclear DNA. The work was carried out in sterile conditions to prevent researchers from contaminating the sample with their own DNA.

Click here to view the original image of 1402x867px.

 

Previous work on sequencing the DNA of ancient human bones from other parts of Japan succeeded in mapping only some of the genome.
This time, thanks to the perfect sample and the latest technological advances, the team teased out the genetic information of all 300 million pairs of the base sequence. Such complete and precise sequencing of ancient human DNA was an extraordinary feat. The researchers call it a "world first."

 

In addition to determining many of the woman's physical characteristics, the analysis revealed that Jomon people had a genetic mutation involving amino acids that made it easier to metabolize fat. The characteristic is common among peoples in arctic regions, but doesn't exist among modern Japanese. It is considered proof that the Jomon people were hunter-gatherers.

Where did the Japanese come from?
Based on their findings, the researchers came closer to answering the question of where the Japanese come from. The genetic information of the Jomon woman tells us that her ancestors descended from continental Eurasian people between 38,000 and 18,000 years ago. That means they had a longer period of hereditary isolation than previously assumed.

 

 

The research also showed that Jomon people shared genetic characteristics with people over a wide stretch of coastal East Asia, from north to south. The woman's genetic makeup has similarities with the Ulchi of the Russian Far East, as well as Koreans and the indigenous Taiwanese Atayal and Ami. These findings begin to add up to a profile of the ancestors of the modern Japanese. They suggest a higher genetic affinity with East Asian coastal peoples than with continental peoples like the Han Chinese.

Click here to view the original image of 1402x789px.

Kenichi Shinoda, Director of the Department of Anthropology at the National Museum of Nature and Science
Kenichi Shinoda with the National Museum of Nature and Science has high hopes for the implications of the research.
"I believe the study of the genes of prehistoric people is set to pick up and leap forward," he says. "The genetic information we have analyzed can hopefully contribute to unraveling the mystery of the origins of the Japanese, or to an understanding of the causes of the diseases to which the Japanese are prone."

For the next phase of the project, researchers will more closely compare the DNA samples of the Jomon woman with modern Japanese over the next four years to find out what further secrets they reveal.
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/n...ckstories/555/

 

Reply
4 Replies
josh avatar
Posts: 4380
Registered
Topic starter
(@zexsypmp23)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago

The Yayoi people (弥生人 Yayoi jin) were an ancient ethnic group that migrated to the Japanese archipelago mainly from the Asian continent during the Yayoi period (300 BCE–300 CE). They interacted and mixed with the Jōmon people to form the modern Japanese people. Most modern Japanese people have primarily Yayoi ancestry (over 80% genetic contribution, on average about 90%).[1][2]

Reconstruction of Yayoi people from the National Museum of Nature and Science in Tokyo, Japan

The Yayoi were present on large parts of the Korean Peninsula before they were displaced and assimilated by arriving proto-Koreans.[11][12] Similarly Whitman (2012) suggests that the Yayoi are not related to the proto-Koreans but that they were present on the Korean peninsula during the Mumun pottery period. According to him, Japonic arrived in the Korean peninsula around 1500 BCE and was brought to the Japanese archipelago by the Yayoi at around 950 BCE. The language family associated with both Mumun and Yayoi culture is Japonic. Koreanic arrived later from Manchuria to the Korean peninsula at around 300 BCE and coexist with the descendants of the Japonic Mumun cultivators (or assimilated them). Both had influence on each other and a later founder effect diminished the internal variety of both language families.[13]

 

Genetics
It is estimated that Yayoi people mainly belonged to Haplogroup O-M176 (O1b2) (today ~36%), Haplogroup O-M122 (O2, formerly O3) (today ~23%) and Haplogroup O-M119 (O1) (today ~4%), which are typical for East- and Southeast-Asians.[14][15] Mitsuru Sakitani suggests that haplogroup O1b2, which is common in today Koreans, Japanese and some Manchu, and O1 are one of the carriers of Yangtze civilization. As the Yangtze civilization declined several tribes crossed westward and northerly, to the Shandong peninsula, the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago.[16] One study calls haplogroup O1b1 as a major Austroasiatic paternal lineage and the haplogroup O1b2 (of Koreans and Japanese) as a "para-Austroasiatic" paternal lineage.[17]

The modern Yamato people are predominantly descendants of the Yayoi people and closely related to other modern East Asians, particularly Koreans and Han Chinese.[18][19][20] It is estimated that the majority of Japanese people around Tokyo have about 12% Jōmon ancestry or less.[21] The general estimate for mainland Japanese is they have inherited less than 20% of the Jōmon genome.[22]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yayoi_people

Reply
saltech
Posts: 67
(@saltech)
Trusted Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Korea had a somewhat similar situation. Genetic testing and anthropometric analysis of the earliest remains in Korea suggest that they were more similar to Caucasians. But they were presumably wiped out after the ice age as the Yellow Sea got filled in with water. Between the end of the ice age and the arrival of the neolithic peoples, it's theorized that the Korean peninsula was completely devoid of human beings.

 

As for this O1b2 being of "Yangtze" or "para-Austroasiatic" origin, they are rather baseless theories with no evidence at all. And they don't match very well with other academic disciplines such as archaeology and linguistics. There is a branch of O1b2 that is found in very low frequencies along the Yangtze river, but the current state of evidence is that it is a relatively new branch where an ancestral sample was found among Koreans. Considering other genetic branches present in southern China, it's more likely this O1b2 branch in southern China came from the Manchus. And as for this "para-Austroasiatic" origin, it's a rather ridiculous theory presented by a linguist who theorized that O1b2 traveled along the Yangtze River, but miraculously left no traces as they were immediately replaced by other population groups. Then again, as I've explained before, the current state of evidence is that O1b2 found in this area is a relatively new branch. The oldest branches are found in Northeast Asia(Manchuria-Korea-Japan), and one in Hainan island. O1b2 has greatest diversity in Northeast Asia, with rare basal branches spreading out into Central Asia, all the way to Afghanistan.

It's much more probable that O1b2 diversified from the O1b ancestral group somewhere between India and Southeast Asia, and moved along the coast in early Holocene and took root in the Bohai Bay area, and expanded from there to west and east.

Reply
1 Reply
josh avatar
Registered
(@zexsypmp23)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 4380

@saltech how will Koreans react if Koreans are proven to have Austroasiatic ancestry? Koreans are well known to have be prideful of having a pure bloodline. 

Reply
saltech
Posts: 67
(@saltech)
Trusted Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Most would be shocked considering it has long been assumed Korean language is part of the Altaic language family. At least now, few linguists dispute that Korean language is part of the Altaic sprachbund, and there are other on-going efforts to revive the Altaic language family, albeit in a different form.

If it is proven Korean and Austroasiatic are proven to share a same ancestral language, it would first come as a wide shock to the linguists, archaeologists and genecists. I am not certain about the Korean public. Vietnam has good relations with Korea these days, so who knows?

Reply