"It Defies Logic": Scientist Finds Telltale Signs Of Election Fraud After Analyzing Mail-In Ballot Data

This is how the results should look. Democrat to Republican votes on the Y axis, and the time of reporting on the X axis. Notice the variation at the beginning, those would be reporting from different precincts with all the variation that entails.

The relatively constant line would be the mail in ballots. They are consistent in ratio because mail in ballots will be representative of the whole. If there is a shift, it should be early and favor the Republicans due to more remote, rural areas taking longer to arrive in the mail.

Both Red and Blue states should echo this, as we see with Minnesota.

monitor res

With Wisconsin and we see a shift at 4am of Nov. 4th. Going from a favor of Republican, to a favor of Democrat.

That's an anomaly showing that the ratio of the population of ballots changed at that time.

It's a shift that, if I were to see on control results at my lab at work, would have me checking the log to see if any maintenance had been performed on my analyzer or if a new calibration or controls had been used. This implies a systematic error.

With Pennsylvania, we see what is called a trend.

tumblr hd images

With a trend, working in a laboratory, I check expirations, dates of opening, or recalibrate. It is indicate of detoriating.

The population is trending towards Democrat votes, most noticeably from the 4th to the 5th.

And with Georgia, we see a trend, then a shift, followed by more trending

c jpg

Michigan, two shifts and trending

Meet Virginia:

What this shows, is that there are at least two separate source anomalies, with several of the battleground states showing both kinds present.

Source:  https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...ng-mail-ballot