Tags
Tab Item Content
Join Us!
Archives Meta
Evidence of Fraud! ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Solved] Evidence of Fraud! Biden Vs Trump Presidential election fraud!

132 Posts
10 Users
32 Reactions
19.2 K Views
josh avatar
Posts: 4380
Registered
Topic starter
(@zexsypmp23)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago


Above is a photo of former President Jimmy Carter and Joe Biden, which is credited as follows: "Bettmann Archive". The photo was posted with an article in the New York Post, dated September 19, 2020. The article is entitled Joe Biden Spent Decades Warning of Voter Fraud — Now called a Myth by Dems. This article is linked to by the article that I've linked to below.

 

Has anyone ever told you that 'You can’t do it' and 'You’re crazy' over and over? Perhaps they’ve told you this so many times, you’ve started to believe it yourself. This is what’s happening in our election today. The media is telling us 'There is no evidence. You can’t prove it' and 'You are just a crazy conspiracy theorist' over and over again. They’re gaslighting, ridiculing, and dismissing. But we all know something is up. 70% of Republicans suspect foul play; far higher than it has ever been in the history of U.S. elections. Something doesn’t smell right, even if we can’t quite put our finger on it. Can we do better than that though? Can we provide evidence? I will argue that we most certainly can. If you suspect fraud or you are open to the possibility, this article is for you.
...

Full article in the Thomistic Thinker

Reply
josh avatar
Posts: 4380
Registered
Topic starter
(@zexsypmp23)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago

 ... A Report on the Fatally Flawed 2016 Democratic Primaries "


Above is the logo of Election Justice USA, the organization that produced the report linked to below. The logo is posted at EJUSA's Facebook page.

 

Election Justice USA (EJUSA) is a national, non-partisan team of seasoned election integrity experts,
attorneys, statisticians, journalists, and activists. The circumstances surrounding Arizona’s
presidential primary on March 22nd, 2016—widely acknowledged as one of the most disastrous
election days in recent memory—were the lightning rod that catalyzed the formation of EJUSA.
Throughout the course of the 2016 presidential primary season, EJUSA has emerged as a leader in the
fight for honest elections, pursuing legal action in several states in an attempt to counteract specific
forms of targeted voter suppression and election fraud.

This report summarizes the work of the Election Justice USA forensics and legal teams during this
period. EJUSA is working not only to expose the voter suppression and election fraud taking place
during the 2016 presidential primaries, but to build a mass movement calling for three simple,
affordable reforms that will render direct fraud and suppression impossible, safeguarding US elections
for future candidates.

Full report by EJUSA

Reply
josh avatar
Posts: 4380
Registered
Topic starter
(@zexsypmp23)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Pennsylvania was Permitted to Count Mail-in Ballots Received Up to Three Days After Election Day



https://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GettyImages-1281102441-scaled-e1603153896929.jp g" alt="" width="600" height="257" border="0" />
The photo above was posted with the article linked to below, and it is credited as follows: "Joe Raedle/Getty Images"

 

The (U.S.) Supreme Court deadlocked Monday, declining to block a Pennsylvania rule that allows mail-in ballots to be counted up to three days after Election Day whether or not they are postmarked by Election Day.
...
Republicans opposed the extension arguing the state’s Supreme Court rule violated federal law that sets Election Day as the first Tuesday of November. They also argued a decision to extend the deadline belongs to the lawmakers, according to NBC.

Full article at the Daily Caller, dated October 19, 2020

Reply
josh avatar
Posts: 4380
Registered
Topic starter
(@zexsypmp23)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Reply
josh avatar
Posts: 4380
Registered
Topic starter
(@zexsypmp23)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Detroit Poll Worker: "I think I’m going to give it to the Democrats."




Above is a photo of Detroit's TCF Center, and the image is credited as follows: "Todd McInturf, The Detroit News"

 

Kristina Karamo was a poll challenger at Detroit’s TCF center. She testified that she saw a poll watcher (engaged in the process of adjudication) manually select candidates on contested ballots that had clearly marked votes for more than one candidate in the same race.

[Explanation of adjudication, from another part of the article: "(The) process of manually entering votes is called adjudication. It’s meant to be used when the machine is unable to read the ballot due to being improperly marked. The poll worker then selects which candidate they think the voter meant to choose." ]

'The poll worker then said, "I think I’m going to give it to the Democrats." That’s absolutely absurd. That is illegal. The vote should have been tossed out. At that moment I said absolutely not, I’m gonna challenge this. So I go get her supervisor.'

Karamo said the supervisor also didn’t enforce the correct legal procedure. She said she then went and got the person overseeing the entire absentee ballot-counting process.

'... The gentleman began screaming at me. Began yelling at me. Began telling me that I had no right to talk to her, and he told her to push the ballot through.'
...

Full article at The Epoch Times

Reply
Page 12 / 21