Tags
Gallery
Tab Item Content
Archives
Meta
Notifications
Clear all
@dyno polys don't like us claiming pacific islander
They don't like slit eyed Filipinos claiming the pacific. But the more pure austronesians are more accepted in the Pacific and Latino community.
We don't have slit eyes 😄
I am talking about members like TJ, Sapphiresky, Asians4blacklivesmatter Or whatever his name is
Posted : 19/10/2021 1:16 am
@dyno polys don't like us claiming pacific islander
They don't like slit eyed Filipinos claiming the pacific. But the more pure austronesians are more accepted in the Pacific and Latino community.
We don't have slit eyes 😄
I am talking about members like TJ, Sapphiresky, Asians4blacklivesmatter Or whatever his name is
Ok
Posted : 19/10/2021 1:24 am
@abbm the ones who remained in China are obviously mixed with Han Chinese DNA by now
How come I don't see austronation genes showing in their DNA test Results
Austronation sounds like a typo but I like the sound of it 😉
Posted : 19/10/2021 2:25 am
Manobos are interesting; I would like to see more studies done on them. Looking at pics of their phenotypes through a google search they give me the impression of strong Melanesian influence like Moluccans.
Posted : 08/12/2021 11:47 am
This may be a supplement to that study. This time it focuses on classifying people by phenotypes...
A research paper, which claims to be a useful aid to biological anthropology, published in the Journal of Forensic Anthropology, collating contemporary Anthropological cranial data showed that the percentage of Filipino bodies who were sampled from the University of the Philippines, that were curated to be representative of Filipinos, that is phenotypically classified as Asian (East, South and Southeast Asian) is 72.7%, Hispanic (Spanish-Amerindian Mestizo, Latin American, or Spanish-Malay Mestizo) is at 12.7%, Indigenous American (Native American) at 7.3%, African at 4.5%, and European at 2.7%.
Posted : 16/01/2022 12:49 pm