Tags
Tab Item Content
Join Us!
Archives Meta
Notifications
Clear all

Human Biology Slant eyes part of the Austronesian genetics?

27 Posts
9 Users
4 Likes
1,489 Views
Bacano G
Posts: 1272
(@jose)
Noble Member
Joined: 4 years ago

We got slant eyes in our genes too 😀 

image
Reply
4 Replies
abbm avatar
 ABBM
(@abbm)
Joined: 3 years ago

Trusted Member
Posts: 59

@jose cards b is genetically black

Reply
Bacano G
(@jose)
Joined: 4 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1272

@abbm https://www.instagram.com/accounts/login/?next=/blackwomenarepoppin/

 

Elsewhere in the video, she said, “I’m not Mexican at all. I’m West Indian, and I’m Dominican. I speak Spanish because I’m Dominican. And it’s like, so what’s the difference between Dominican and Mexican?’ And it’s like, everything!”

Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@jose LOL that's more like an Egyptian eye.

Reply
Bacano G
(@jose)
Joined: 4 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1272

@dyno taino eyes

Reply
cheesefries
Posts: 90
(@cheesefries)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago

Austronesian Taiwanese Aborigines migrated out of Southern China into Taiwan then into Philippines etc.. they are genetically linked to Daic peoples. Modern-day Southern Chinese like the Cantonese etc already have significant Austronesian admixture according to the chart below...but it was the more northern Han Chinese with the epicanthic genetics who migrated southwards into South China and mixed with them to bring about the modern Southern Chinese race. So the original Austronesians from mainland China probably didn't evolve slanty eyes yet from cold Siberian climate I'm guessing; though there are plenty of present-day South Chinese people who don't have the stereotypical Chinesey eyes as well.

The original Austronesians from South China were probably Australoid-Negritos who've transitioned to a more Mongoloid phenotype from the advent of rice farming and evolution or mixing with other groups etc

Reply
1 Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@cheesefries The difference with Austronesian with Han Chinese is as distant as a Native Indian to a East Asians. Southern Chinese have rounder eyes because of mixing with other Austroasiatic like the Vietnamese. Austronesians however have very little genetic connection with Han Chinese to prove this Sino-Austronesian connection. 

Reply
cheesefries
Posts: 90
(@cheesefries)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago

Ancient DNA is revealing the genetic landscape of people who first settled East Asia

FEBRUARY 4, 2021
The very first human beings originally emerged in Africa before spreading across Eurasia about 60,000 years ago. After that, the story of humankind heads down many different paths, some more well-studied than others.
By Melinda Yang, assistant professor of biology

Eastern regions of Eurasia are home to approximately 2.3 billion people today — roughly 30% of the world’s population. Archaeologists know from fossils and artifacts that modern humans have occupied Southeast Asia for 60,000 years and East Asia for 40,000 years.

But there’s a lot left to untangle. Who were the people who first came to these regions and eventually developed agriculture? Where did different populations come from? Which groups ended up predominant and which died out?

Ancient DNA is helping to answer some of these questions. By sequencing the genomes of people who lived many millennia ago, scientists like me are starting to fill in the picture of how Asia was populated.

Whole skeleton of an ~8,700-year-old individual from Xiaogao, Shandong, China (location A on map). Together with Bianbian, the Xiaogao individual represents a northern ancestry that can be found along the Yellow River and up into the eastern steppes of Siberia. Photo by Jianfeng Lang, Shandong University

Analyzing ancient genomes

In 2016, I joined Dr. Qiaomei Fu’s Molecular Paleontology Lab at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing. Our challenge: Resolve the history of humans in East Asia, with the help of collaborators who were long dead —ancient humans who lived up to tens of thousands of years ago in the region.

A scientist in full-body protective equipment holds up a tube of bone powder used to extract ancient DNA for analysisMembers of the lab extracted and sequenced ancient DNA using human remains from archaeological sites. Then Dr. Fu and I used computational genomic tools to assess how their DNA related to that of previously sequenced ancient and present-day humans.

One of our sequences came from ancient DNA extracted from the leg bones of the Tianyuan Man, a 40,000-year-old individual discovered near a famous paleoanthropological site in western Beijing. As one of the earliest modern humans found in East Asia, his genetic sequence marks him as an early ancestor of today’s Asians and Native Americans. That he lived where China’s current capital stands indicates that the ancestors of today’s Asians began placing roots in East Asia as early as 40,000 years ago.

Farther south, two 8,000- to 4,000-year-old Southeast Asian hunter-gatherers from Laos and Malaysia associated with the Hòabìnhian culture have DNA that, like the Tianyuan Man, shows they’re early ancestors of Asians and Native Americans. These two came from a completely different lineage than the Tianyuan Man, which suggests that many genetically distinct populations occupied Asia in the past.

But no humans today share the same genetic makeup as either Hòabìnhians or the Tianyuan Man, in both East and Southeast Asia. Why did ancestries that persisted for so long vanish from the gene pool of people alive now? Ancient farmers carry the key to that answer.

 

DNA carries marks of ancient migrations

Based on plant remains found at archaeological sites, scientists know that people domesticated millet in northern China’s Yellow River region about 10,000 years ago. Around the same time, people in southern China’s Yangtze River region domesticated rice.

Unlike in Europe, plant domestication began locally and was not introduced from elsewhere. The process took thousands of years, and societies in East Asia grew increasingly complex, with the rise of the first dynasties around 4,000 years ago.

 

Ancient DNA reveals rapid shifts in ancestry over the last 10,000 years across Asia, likely due to migration and cultural exchange.

 

 

That’s also when rice cultivation appears to have spread from its origins to areas farther south, including lands that are today’s Southeast Asian countries. DNA helps tell the story. When rice farmers from southern China expanded southward, they introduced not only their farming technology but also their genetics to local populations of Southeast Asian hunter-gatherers.

The overpowering influx of their DNA ended up swamping the local gene pool. Today, little trace of hunter-gatherer ancestry remains in the genes of people who live in Southeast Asia.

Farther north, a similar story played out. Ancient Siberian hunter-gatherers show little relationship with East Asians today, but later Siberian farmers are closely related to today’s East Asians. Farmers from northern China moved northward into Siberia bringing their DNA with them, leading to a sharp decrease in prevalence of the previous local hunter-gatherer ancestry.

Past populations were more diverse than today’s

Genetically speaking, today’s East Asians are not very different from each other. A lot of DNA is needed to start genetically distinguishing between people with different cultural histories.

What surprised Dr. Fu and me was how different the DNA of various ancient populations were in China. We and others found shared DNA across the Yellow River region, a place important to the development of Chinese civilization. This shared DNA represents a northern East Asian ancestry, distinct from a southern East Asian ancestry we found in coastal southern China.

[2.] Whole skeleton of an ~8,400-year-old individual from Qihe cave, Fujian, China. This individual's southern ancestry can be found along the coast of mainland southern China and islands in the Taiwan Strait. Comparisons to ancient individuals like Qihe show that the deep roots of Austronesian-speakers is in Neolithic populations from southern China (location B on map). [3.] Piece of petrous bone from a ~9,500-year-old individual from Bianbian Cave, Shandong, China. This individual represents a northern ancestry found along the Yellow River and up into the eastern steppes of Siberia (location C on map). [4.] Whole skeleton of a ~8,300-year-old individual from Liangdao, an island in the Matsu archipelago 24 km offshore from Fujian, China, in the Taiwan Strait. The Liangdao individual has a southern ancestry that can be found along the coast of mainland southern China and islands in the Taiwan Strait. Comparisons to ancient individuals like Liangdao show that the deep roots of Austronesian-speakers is in the early Neolithic period of Southeast Asia (location D on map). Photos by Xuechun Fan, International Research Center for Austronesian Archaeology, Pingtan; Hunglin Chiu, Institute of Anthropology, National Tsinghua University, Hsinchu; Wei Gao, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology

When we analyzed the DNA of people who lived in coastal southern China 9,000–8,500 years ago, we realized that already by then much of China shared a common heritage. Because their archaeology and morphology was different from that of the Yellow River farmers, we had thought these coastal people might come from a lineage not closely related to those first agricultural East Asians. Maybe this group’s ancestry would be similar to the Tianyuan Man or Hòabìnhians.

But instead, every person we sampled was closely related to present-day East Asians. That means that by 9,000 years ago, DNA common to all present-day East Asians was widespread across China.

Today’s northern and southern Chinese populations share more in common with ancient Yellow River populations than with ancient coastal southern Chinese. Thus, early Yellow River farmers migrated both north and south, contributing to the gene pool of humans across East and Southeast Asia.

The coastal southern Chinese ancestry did not vanish, though. It persisted in small amounts and did increase in northern China’s Yellow River region over time. The influence of ancient southern East Asians is low on the mainland, but they had a huge impact elsewhere. On islands spanning from the Taiwan Strait to Polynesia live the Austronesians, best known for their seafaring. They possess the highest amount of southern East Asian ancestry today, highlighting their ancestry’s roots in coastal southern China.

[5.] Skull of an ~8,700-year-old individual from Xiaogao, Shandong, China (location A on map), [6.] Harpoon found at the Liangdao site (location D on map). Photos by Wei Gao, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology; Chungyu Chen, Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Taipei

Other emerging genetic patterns show connections between Tibetans and ancient individuals from Mongolia and northern China, raising questions about the peopling of the Tibetan Plateau.

Ancient DNA reveals rapid shifts in ancestry over the last 10,000 years across Asia, likely due to migration and cultural exchange. Until more ancient human DNA is retrieved, scientists can only speculate as to exactly who, genetically speaking, lived in East Asia prior to that.

This article is republished from TheConversation.com, where it first appeared.
Reply
5 Replies
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@cheesefries According to this Chinese source, Han Chinese started from the Yellow River. There is no evidence of Austronesian & Han Chinese having contact 10,000 years ago.

Reply
James avatar
(@james)
Joined: 5 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1690

@dyno cheesebuns has s secret agenda linking Austronesian and han chinese

Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@james Africans have slant eyes without East Asian genes. 

image
Reply
James avatar
(@james)
Joined: 5 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1690

@cheesefries never trust a Chinese source. give us another source that supports these theory.

Reply
dyno avatar
(@dyno)
Joined: 3 years ago

Noble Member
Posts: 1462

@james Data says ancient coastal population are not Chinese but Melanesians who are closer to Austronesians. If I was an Afro centric then I would be ecstatic that African Melanesians once roam China.

Reply
Page 2 / 2